For office use only
LLN&D Spike Profile
Automatic screening estimates are generated from the applicant’s entered responses. The benchmark profile is shown in blue; the applicant estimate overlays in orange. Any estimated level below the benchmark is highlighted in the PDF with a gap comment. This is a screening guide only and should be reviewed with assessor judgement.
Complete the Learning response to estimate this level.
Complete the Reading questions to estimate this level.
Complete the email task to estimate this level.
Estimated at 3+ once applicant responses are entered, pending phone/video assessment or enrolment communication review.
Complete the Numeracy calculations to estimate this level.
Complete the Digital literacy questions to estimate this level.
Gap Comments
Optional Extension Tasks
Use these tasks when the first screening responses are borderline, when the applicant will study mainly online, or when the RTO needs more evidence before deciding on a support plan.
| Skill sampled | Extension task | What to look for | Evidence / notes |
| Reading + digital literacy |
Ask the applicant to locate one unit, module or core component that is part of their selected program and identify the code, title, current release/status and one assessment condition or task requirement. |
Can locate relevant information, avoid outdated documents, distinguish unit code/title from qualification code/title, and extract specific information. |
|
| Writing + learning |
Ask the applicant to write a short reflective paragraph: “What part of this qualification do you think will be most challenging for you and what support would help?” |
Insight, willingness to seek support, structured writing, realistic self-assessment. |
|
| Oral communication |
Ask the applicant to give a 2-minute verbal explanation of a simple workplace process from their industry. |
Clear sequencing, plain language, ability to adapt explanation, response to clarifying questions. |
|
| Numeracy |
Give the applicant a simple training calendar and ask them to identify total sessions, total delivery hours, and one scheduling conflict. |
Interprets dates/times, calculates duration, identifies constraints. |
|
Rating Guide
| Rating | Descriptor | Typical action |
| 4 – Meets expected qualification demand | Response shows independent performance at the expected qualification demand. Minor errors do not affect meaning or task completion. | Proceed with enrolment. Provide standard study orientation and support information. |
| 3 – Mostly meets demand with minor support needs | Response is generally adequate, but the applicant may need targeted support in one or two areas, such as assessment writing, digital systems or numeracy checks. | Proceed with enrolment and document a light-touch support plan. |
| 2 – Significant support required | Response shows difficulty with the skill demand. Applicant may struggle without structured coaching, pre-course preparation or adjusted support. | Discuss support options before enrolment. Create an LLN&D support plan and consider pre-course preparation. |
| 1 – Not yet ready for this demand | Response shows the applicant is unlikely to manage core qualification tasks without substantial support. | Recommend foundation skill development, preparatory study, alternate pathway or delayed enrolment. |
Assessor Notes and Safeguards
- Use professional judgement. A single spelling error or calculation slip should not automatically reduce the rating if the applicant can demonstrate the required skill through another authentic response.
- Record any reasonable adjustment provided during screening, such as oral clarification, extra time, assistive technology or accessible document format.
- Treat digital access separately from digital capability. Lack of access to a device or internet may require an access solution, not necessarily a low digital literacy judgement.
- Where an applicant discloses disability, health, language background or other personal circumstances, only record information relevant to learning support and with appropriate privacy safeguards.
- Do not use this screening tool as an assessment instrument for any unit, module or competency in the selected program.
Basis for Tool Design
| Source / framework | How it informed the screening tool |
| training.gov.au – selected SpecTraining qualification or accredited course | Used to ground the qualification purpose, likely workplace/study role expectations and the broad documentation, communication, numeracy and digital demands sampled in the screening tasks. |
| Australian Core Skills Framework (ACSF) | Used to structure the five core skills: Learning, Reading, Writing, Oral Communication and Numeracy. |
| Digital Literacy Skills Framework (DLSF) | Used to structure digital literacy tasks relevant to online learning, LMS navigation, file management, online search and digital communication. |