SpecTraining RPL Validation Session Report

RPL validation assessment record

Post Use Validation Session Reports

Complete this interactive version of the validation template, preserve the case-study data, and download a PDF for assessment submission.

Prepared from the interactive SpecTraining validation form.

Qualification / skill set TAESS00029 Unit focus TAEDEL311 + BSBCMM411 RTO ID 31971

Instructions for Post-Use Validation Participants

Use this section to confirm the purpose and flow of the validation before completing the tables below.

Reference

Show validation instructions and reminders

1. Familiarise yourself with the purposePost-use validation confirms that the RTO assessment system produced consistently valid assessment judgements.

2. Review the validation planUnderstand which units or qualifications are being validated, why they were selected, your role, and the timeframe.

3. Prepare for the sessionReview the training package requirements, units of competency, industry standards, Principles of Assessment, and Rules of Evidence.

4. During the sessionExamine assessment tools, check completed student assessments, compare assessment decisions, and consider whether evidence supports competency.

5. Record your findingsDocument observations, discrepancies, concerns, and specific examples that support your findings.

6. Contribute recommendationsSuggest improvements to assessment tools, processes, assessor guidance, or broader system issues where needed.

7. Participate in final discussionCollaborate with validators to reach consensus and contribute to any action plan.

8. Review and sign offCheck that all concerns and recommendations are captured accurately before submission.

Remember: base your judgements on training package requirements, the Principles of Assessment, and the Rules of Evidence. Maintain objectivity, confidentiality, and a focus on improving the assessment system.

Validation scenario

Choose the assessment task

Choose Task 7, Task 8, or Task 9 to load the matching case-study data.

Assessment task scenario

Part 1: Validation Preparation

Complete the preparation details and tick each preparation action once confirmed.

Complete first

Assessor name (you)?

Date of validation?

Others in the validation team? Enter full names only, separated by commas. These names will be copied into the feedback section.

Lead validator name To maintain impartiality, the lead validator should not have been involved in the original assessment decision.

Candidate name(s)

Unit codes assessed

Prepare for validation activities	Information provided	Tick
Checked and confirmed with RTO/lead validator
Confirmed my role in the validation with lead validator	Role as identified: Validation participant / assessor
Received validation documentation prior to activity	Documents received: Assessment decision instrument(s) Post-use validation session reports (this document) Assessor Guide Assessment Instruments applied Student Evidence Gathered
Reviewed unit(s) of competency for validation for understanding of assessment evidence requirements	Unit(s): TAEDEL311 Provide work skill instruction BSBCMM411 Make presentations
Reviewed samples of evidence collected and assessment judgements made	Instruments used: TAESS00029 RPL Decision Instrument and Summary Register TAESS00029 Assessment Decision (RPL)

Part 2: Code of Conduct

All validation participants must agree to these terms before the report is submitted.

Required

Prepare for the validation as instructed.
Be honest, respectful, and open-minded with the validation leader and each other.
Contribute to equal airtime so everyone can share questions, ideas, concerns, or mistakes without interruption or fear.
Share opinions openly, honestly, and respectfully with an intent to collaborate and agree on effective recommendations.
Aim for consensus. If consensus is not reached, the validation leader will ensure all opinions and recommendations are recorded, then decide the most appropriate recommendation after the meeting.
Respect copyright. The materials and templates used in the validation are commercial intellectual property and must not be distributed.
Respect confidentiality. Do not share sensitive information about the assessment tool, student work, assessor practice, or other confidential matters outside the validation session.
Follow standard etiquette for live online meetings, if applicable.

Yes, the validation participant and other participants agree to these terms.The completed validation record may be accessible to authorised personnel, including auditors and staff or contractors reviewing recommended improvements.

Part 3: Validation Session Checklist – After Use

Select the candidates included in this validation. The repeated Candidate 1, 2, and 3 judgement sections will appear only for selected candidates.

Interactive

Qualification / skill set code and title

Validation date

Units of competency covered by this assessment tool, instrument, or process

Assessment documents evaluated

Student assessments applied in this validation

Name	Date of assessment	Evidence reviewed

Part 4: Assessment Processes, Methods, and Tools

Review the assessment processes, methods, and tools against the unit requirements, assessment conditions, and principles of assessment.

Checklist

Assessment processes, methods, and tools

Use Yes, No, or Not applicable where appropriate. Add comments below for any action needed.

Comments / recommendations

Assessment tool requires

Part 5: Recommendations and Comments

Summarise your validation of each judgement, then reflect on the validation process used by the team.

Finalise

Candidate name	Evidence reviewed	Assessor decision	Do you agree?	Recommended action

In review

Reflect on the validation process that you and the team applied. The prompts below mirror the original template.

I sought feedback from the following people

Name 1 Position 1 Name 2 Position 2 Name 3 Position 3 Name 4 Position 4

What technique did you and the validation team apply to review the evidence and assessor judgement??

What was the biggest challenge when reviewing the evidence and assessment decision??

How did the team work through the challenge to come to an agreement?

How would you change the way you performed the validation?

When complete, use Download PDF. Your entries are also auto-saved in this browser.